POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Random wonderings 6052701905145 : Re: Random wonderings 6052701905145 Server Time
29 Jul 2024 20:17:13 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Random wonderings 6052701905145  
From: clipka
Date: 15 Sep 2011 10:29:21
Message: <4e720bc1@news.povray.org>
Am 15.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Invisible:

>  From that description, it sounds like zinc itself contains energy.
> Which raises a few questions:
>
> 1. Why do you need a fruit at all? Why can't you just extract the energy
> from the zinc?
>
> 2. Why does the other electrode need to be copper? If the energy comes
> from the zinc, surely *any* metal will do?
>
> 3. Why does using a potato work, but using a glass of water doesn't?

2. In layman's terms, the other electrode needs to be some metal that 
"contains less energy" than zinc (and should be a good conductor, 
comparatively inexpensive, and maybe meet a few less obvious constraints 
of the experiment)

1. + 3. You need a medium between the two electrodes that is a poor 
conductor for electrons (otherwise they would just migrate via that 
medium rather than the wire and load), but easily provides for free ions 
(otherwise the electron flow through the wire would quickly cease due to 
buildup of an electrostatic potential). Lemons and potatoes are quite 
good at this, while plain water isn't. (Battery acid is even better, but 
poorly suited to let children toy around with.)


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.