|
|
On 9/8/2011 1:14, Invisible wrote:
> No, that's exactly what the "cache coherence" protocol prevents.
Sure. I'm just saying that saying "it's write-once" doesn't automatically
mean it's thread safe in a modern multi-processor. The generated code
actually has to take some care to tell the processor to flush cache lines
and such.
> If defies my comprehension that what Google does is actually physically
> possible, but anyway...
It kind of boggles my mind too. Just the complexity of the monitoring stuff
is stunning, let alone actually getting work done. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
How come I never get only one kudo?
Post a reply to this message
|
|