|
|
On 9/6/2011 8:03, Warp wrote:
> Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Then the old heap is in oldheap and the new heap is in newheap.
>
> Is this supposed to be efficient?
If your functional language is pure enough, your compiler can often optimize
out the apparent inefficiency. Of course, that requires a Sufficiently Smart
Compiler.
In practice, it's less efficient, but not as obviously awful as it would appear.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
How come I never get only one kudo?
Post a reply to this message
|
|