On 06/09/2011 04:03 PM, Warp wrote:
> Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom>  wrote:
>> Then the old heap is in oldheap and the new heap is in newheap.
>
>    Is this supposed to be efficient?

Modifying log N nodes of the old heap to construct the new one? I'd say 
it's reasonably efficient, yes.

Post a reply to this message