|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 08:00:28 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> On 8/20/2011 22:52, Shay wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:49:01 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/19/2011 13:04, Shay wrote:
>>>> bool_a = len(A[0]) == 2
>>>> bool_b = min([A[2] == x[2] for x in A[1:]) bool_c = ccw_angle(*A)<
>>>> pi
>>>>
>>>> bool_b will not work if bool_a is true
>>>
>>> bool_b = bool_a ? min(...) : false
>>
>> Beautiful, but that doesn't seem to be valid Python.
>
> OK. I had assumed python had that operator. It's the same as
>
> if bool_a then bool_b = min(...) else bool_b = false;
>
>> bool_b = False if bool_a else min(...) does work. So, I learned
>> something there.
>
> I think you *might* have the condition reversed on that. That looks like
> it's saying you don't evaluate bool_b if bool_a is true.
That's what I want. I mistyped a portion of my example
bool_b = min([A[2] == x[2] for x in A[1:])
should have been
bool_b = min([A[0][2] == x[2] for x in A[1:])
bool_b tests if all of the [2]s are equal. If bool_a is true, there are
no [2]s.
Thanks for the help.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |