On 8/7/2011 21:20, nemesis wrote:
> BTW, for a long while now I've been a happy vim user, which is about the same as
> emacs.

I think elisp is probably easier to program than vim macros. You really have 
to be into programmable calculators to make sense of vim macros. Altho they 
are, technically, turing complete. Every time I use something besides vim, I 
find I miss the "." command most.

Given that, having something actually integrated with the compiler so you 
get stuff like intelisense is often worth the loss of power.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   How come I never get only one kudo?

Post a reply to this message