|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 7/1/2011 15:15, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Sure. I get that.
You realize that of all the people who might read that, you're pretty much
the bottom of the list of target audience, right? :-)
>> The real use of nullable in C# isn't for "Maybe" cases, but for SQL. If
> Fair enough. But the net effect appears to be similar.
Yeah. You just use it for different things. More like, it's similar in SQL
to Maybe, and you use C#'s Nullable to talk to SQL, so ...
>>> (Not to mention "Monoid" verses "Composable"...)
>>
>> I don't know what "Composable" is. I don't think C# is meta enough to
>> have that as a specific language-level concept.
>
> It's something you sometimes find implemented in specific application
> programs.
That's what I'm saying. "Composable" is a design pattern, not something
actually in the language or libraries.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Coding without comments is like
driving without turn signals."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |