On 06/07/2011 10:13 PM, stbenge wrote:
> It probably won't, and it's not my fault <g> Maybe if you use
> superellipsoids instead of rounded boxes, the memory requirement of the
> macro will be lower (just a guess).

Yep ... no difference. The number of parsed tokens sky-rockets when 
scaling is less than 0.75 (OTO). I ended up using twice that in this 
version.

I /really/ like the reflected view but I'm not so sure about the pose. 
The backside illumination on the shrubs turned out cool with the light 
at this angle, I also put some specular and a normal on the floor.

Before I decide if I want to develop this approach and further I figured 
I'd post to see what kind of reaction I get ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'ndi.png' (357 KB)

Preview of image 'ndi.png'