>> Hahaha! Yes, the solution to something really inaccurate is to use
>> something even *more* inaccurate! :-D
>
> Yes. We do that all the time. What do you think digital technology is?

Using a digital representation for something which is actually 
continuous allows you to trade an insignificant degrees in capture 
precision for an infinite gain in copy fidelity.

Using a digital representation for something which is actually digital 
anyway is just a case of using the correct tool for the job. :-P

What you're proposing is akin to "hey, it's really hard to hit a dart 
board from 237 cm away; let's try doing in blind-fold instead".

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message