On 6/8/2011 1:10, Invisible wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 07:34 PM, Darren New wrote:
>> On 6/7/2011 10:44, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> And that's why when somebody says "one time I did <insert very unlikely
>>> thing here>", people tend not to believe it.
>>
>> So, you're saying I'm lying?
>
> I'm saying that if you casually claim to have solved a problem which has
> stumped AI researchers for decades, I'm going to be /slightly sceptical/
> about it. Which seems quite rational to me...

Recognising a tune has stumped researches for decades?

I didn't solve it. The guys who invented MP3 solved it. I just used it to 
build a bigger system, then watched it work.

What's unlikely about a computer figuring out the primary pitches of a 
recorded piece of music, comparing it to the primary pitches of other music, 
and deciding they're the same?  Is that more amazing than tineye?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."

Post a reply to this message