On 6/7/2011 8:57, Aydan wrote:
> Invisible<voi### [at] devnull>  wrote:
>> On 07/06/2011 04:41 PM, Darren New wrote:
>>> On 6/7/2011 8:39, Invisible wrote:
>>>> This would be a rather stunning result for AI.
>>>
>>> It wasn't even what you'd call AI nowadays. It was just pattern matching.
>>
>> Given that two different, unrelated recordings of the same piece of
>> music have entirely unrelated waveforms, I'm not sure how you can claim
>> that simple pattern matching would find such a complex similarity.
>>
>>> Why are you using the subjunctive, as if this is a fictional story?
>>
>> Damnit, now I have to go look up what a "subjunctive" is...
>
> You're not matching the waveform but the spectrum.

Or, in this case, "I went to the store yesterday" followed by "that would be 
cool if it were possible."

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."

Post a reply to this message