On 07/06/2011 04:41 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 6/7/2011 8:39, Invisible wrote:
>> This would be a rather stunning result for AI.
>
> It wasn't even what you'd call AI nowadays. It was just pattern matching.

Given that two different, unrelated recordings of the same piece of 
music have entirely unrelated waveforms, I'm not sure how you can claim 
that simple pattern matching would find such a complex similarity.

> Why are you using the subjunctive, as if this is a fictional story?

Damnit, now I have to go look up what a "subjunctive" is...

Post a reply to this message