|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 02.06.2011 09:56, schrieb Invisible:
>>>> OSes are like cities: built on top of the ruins of older ones...
>>>
>>> This seems to be the main think that's broken about both Windows and
>>> Linux. Too many decades of backwards compatibility.
>>
>> Coincidentally that's exactly what made them successful in the first
>> place (as opposed to e.g. BeOS). You know, avoiding the hen-and-egg
>> problem of OS vs. applications.
>
> The same could be said of the ancient x86 platform, which still supports
> running obsolete versions of MS-DOS if you want to.
Egg-sactly.
>> Hm... which makes me think: Has there ever been any attempts yet to
>> implement a stand-alone JVM as an OS?
>
> Isn't that kind of the original *point* of Java?
Not sure; the way it is /implemented/, the JVM seems to always be an
intermediate layer on top of some host OS. It might have gained enough
momentum by now though that a dedicated Java OS might be successful.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |