Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> >   As I said in my post, it's perfectly possible to make a photo of the
> > Moon so that it looks enormous compared to the details on the ground.
> > Just use a really strong zoom.

> There would be artifacts, stretching, or *something* that made it obvious 
> it was faked using optics.

  Faked? Faked compared to what? What is a "normal" zoom level?

  Is the image shown by a microscope "faked"? How about an image taken by
Hubble? Is that "faked" as well? What's the difference?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message