On 5/11/2011 13:27, Warp wrote:
>    C# isn't C++...

I know that. I'm just saying that I was surprised it worked in C++ because 
everything I've ever read except the standard implies it shouldn't. Every 
tutorial etc etc etc says "You can't put a value after a return in a void 
function, and you have to put a value after a return in a non-void 
function."  So it surprised me this was actually not true for C++. So I 
figured I'd try specifically for C#, because maybe all the tutorials for 
*that* were wrong. :-)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."

Post a reply to this message