>> Huh. I wonder if that's just a GCC thing or whether that's actually in the>> standard. I just *actually* tried it with C# and I get "since XYZ returns>> void, the return statement may not be followed by an expression.">> C# isn't C++...
Presumably that's the whole point of C++. ;-)
Oh, wait...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
