Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 12:57, Warp wrote:
> > compiles and runs just fine.

> Huh. I wonder if that's just a GCC thing or whether that's actually in the 
> standard.  I just *actually* tried it with C# and I get "since XYZ returns 
> void, the return statement may not be followed by an expression."

  C# isn't C++...

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message