Jaime Vives Piqueres escreveu:

>> But Ive, it looks like in your last comment, you just provided more
>> evidence for the UV hypothesis. You held back on hyper-realism in
>> order to provide *some* benefit, and whatever reason is analogous to
>>  the "emotional response" in the Y-axis of the UV.
> 
>   I don't believe that the UV can be applied to anything else than
> human-like things. The hypothesis only applies to human-like things, and
> every explanation about it only covers human characteristics.
> 
>   Your aversion for hyper-realism it's something else... it can be
> something similar to my dislike for surrealism or abstraction: I just
> underrate failed attempts because of my own inability to create good
> images on these styles.

haha, I knew you two guys would clash on this one.

Indeed I would take many of Jaime's povving's for photographs, even old 
ones (despite these not even having DOF and other camera artifacts).

and yes, I agree UV only applies to human characters.  Each day, even 
less so it seems.

-- 
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9

Post a reply to this message