> But Ive, it looks like in your last comment, you just provided more
> evidence for the UV hypothesis. You held back on hyper-realism in
> order to provide *some* benefit, and whatever reason is analogous to
>  the "emotional response" in the Y-axis of the UV.

   I don't believe that the UV can be applied to anything else than
human-like things. The hypothesis only applies to human-like things, and
every explanation about it only covers human characteristics.

   Your aversion for hyper-realism it's something else... it can be
something similar to my dislike for surrealism or abstraction: I just
underrate failed attempts because of my own inability to create good
images on these styles.

-- 
Jaime Vives Piqueres
		
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org

Post a reply to this message