On 4/29/2011 2:55, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> You understand that Darcs *does* have an ordering between *related* patches,
> right? It's only *unrelated* patches that have no order relationship.

BTW, the problem here is that those patches are *not* related. Each branch 
down the side is a separate Darcs repository. So the first guy takes A, 
makes it a B, then patches it back to A. In parallel, in *your* repository, 
you independently take A and make it into B. Now everyone copy all the 
patches from everyone else. Do I wind up with A or B? I'm not sure there's 
an answer there that makes sense from a technical perspective.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."

Post a reply to this message