|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:40:37 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> On 4/25/2011 14:13, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> But if I were to describe the change in state, it would be "I no longer
>> need to believe that the sun is up - I know it is."
>
> So if evidence obviates belief, and evidence obviates faith, what is the
> difference between the two?
Faith is less justified than belief, perhaps? Similar concepts, but at
different places along the scale.
>> IOW, it's not that finding out causes disbelief, it removes the need
>> for belief because it's demonstrably true.
>
> We're just using the words differently. Knowledge is justified true
> belief. It can be demonstratively true yet not believed (a creationist
> and evolution) and it can be demonstratively true and believed (a
> scientist and evolution).
Again, going to have to give this more thought. I *really* like
discussions like this because they give me a chance to stretch my
brain. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |