On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:05:31 +0200, andrel wrote:

> On 25-4-2011 23:43, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:33:00 +0200, andrel wrote:
> 
>>> Only if it is nor was at any time able to interfere in this universe.
>>> (my feeling is that this is correct English, my brain says 'huh,
>>> aren't you missing a negation', but where to put it?)
>>
>> Maybe try saying it a different way - I think I understand, but I want
>> to be sure before I comment. :)
> 
> I am prepared to accept any deity if and only if it has never had any
> influence on my universe and it will never have, and as long as it's
> existence can be rigorously and scientifically proven by an experiment.

So a deity that has no past, present, or future influence over the 
universe?  I'm not sure what purpose that would serve.

But that is how I read what you wrote the first time.

Jim

Post a reply to this message