|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:32:11 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> So, sure, using the layman's "theory" might be legitimate, its ***not***
> legitimate if the thing being discussed is scientific evidence, since
> doing so is not going to help you find out which is which
Except that we're talking about laypeople talking about science - people
who *think* they're using the term correctly. People who are *convinced*
they know what they're talking about.
People who *believe* that there is only one meaning for the word.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |