|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 4/22/2011 15:03, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Its the only conceivable condition where you can spend your time looking for
> the genetic equivalent of Bigfoot, and actually find something that isn't a
> man in a gorilla suit.
Except, in that case, it *is* precisely a man in a gorilla suit. Humans
tinkering with DNA are no more unnatural than beavers building dams. The
only way you'd actually be justified in teaching that anything discovered by
evolution is in doubt is if there was a *supernatural* source. Aliens
visiting and modifying the DNA doesn't mean the DNA didn't evolve. Not even
large black rectangular aliens.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Coding without comments is like
driving without turn signals."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |