On 4/20/2011 22:06, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:26:31 +0200, andrel wrote:
>
>>> And what is the hypothesis? That a particular protein didn't evolve? Or
>>> that some intelligence actually created that protein?
>>
>> That there are proteins (etc.) that didn't evolve by natural selection.
>> Or even weaker that their presence is easier explained by design than as
>> a result of natural selection. (hijacking Occam's razor).
>
> No, that's not correct.  Just because something can't be explained by
> evolution (assuming it were found) doesn't mean ID is how it occurred.
> What it means is we don't understand the process by which it occurred.

That was exactly my point. Everyone on the goddidit side believes there's 
only evolution or god.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Coding without comments is like
    driving without turn signals."

Post a reply to this message