Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> On 4/17/2011 1:09, Warp wrote:
> >    Lowering birth rates was kind of also implied in my statement above.
> > (Most of the first-world countries have pretty low birth rates.)

> OK. And much of the argument for letting third-world countries pollute is to 
> get them up to first-world economics where the birth rate is much lower. 
> See? :-)

  I don't think lowering birth rates requires first-world economics.
It just requires politics. (I don't know if China is considered a
"first-world country", but they have the birth rate problem somewhat
under control at least, but not for the same reasons as many first-world
countries.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message