On 4/13/2011 11:01 AM, Alain wrote:
> Le 2011/04/13 12:03, Jim Henderson a écrit :
>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:27:59 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/31/feedback-t-rex-and-
>> humans
>>>
>>> I literally can't decide whether this is serious or not.
>>
>> They are serious - it does look a lot like someone's having a joke, but
>> young-Earth creationists really do believe in the literal truth of the
>> bible as a historic record of how the Earth and humanity came into
>> existence, and anything to the contrary is rejected because it isn't
>> consistent with the bible.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Even if there is something that can be called "God", and that thing is
> unfailible.
> It's "teatchings" where reported by some men, who are failible.
> The bible was recorded by failible men.
> It's content was passed by oral tradition for over a millenia, with all
> the changes and morfing that this imply.
> Peoples with somewhat similar names are often merged into one.
> Peoples with somewhat similar stories can also get merged into one,
> keeping the most memorable name.
> The languages used did change a LOT in that time.
> The writen form was translated countless times.
>
> Each step does bring some alterations.
>
> Now, how can you view that kind of text?
>
>
> Alain
If you are a faith head, as a work that changes over time to become 
"more true to the original intent". Yeah, I know.. Its like having a two 
year old tell you that they are *sure* the last message in a game of 
"telephone" is 100% correct...

Post a reply to this message