Le_Forgeron wrote:
> May be it would then need a better name than "angle of incidence" (aoi)> as it would then ignore the actual surface.
Maybe the keyword aoi could be kept but in the documentation
described as "angle of incident ray", which it still is, just
not necessarily in relation to the surface normal.
> would expect another range than 0 to 90 degrees ?
0 to 180 would seem appropriate.
