|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 30/07/2010 12:41 PM, clipka wrote:
>
> Me being a nitpicker,
I'm sure I have a few more decades practice than you. :-P
> I conclude that the article supports my layman
> assertion, and that the poem in question - though qualifying as an
> "English haiku" or "haiku in English" - does indeed not qualify as a
> regular "haiku" ;-)
I concur and it is not in Japanese, either.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |