High!

clipka wrote:
> To me these images look like you definitely have /some/ kind of 
> precision problem there. Looks to me like POV-Ray doesn't get enough 
> "potential difference" for normals computation. Maybe making the 
> isosurface function "sharper" might help somehow (if you know what I mean).

Normals? The texture of the isosurface doesn't contain any normal 
statement... and what do you mean with "sharper"? Adding more 
ruggedness, steeper ridges?

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar

Post a reply to this message