"Christian Froeschlin" <chr### [at] chrfrde> schreef in bericht 
news:4acf14a8@news.povray.org...
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
>> Ambient? No ambient. Only radiosity and some fog. Display gamma at 2.2. 
>> no assumed gamma. rendered in 3.7
>
> Hmm it looks bright to be too. Funny thing is it seems to look
> better to me when applying the inverse gamma correction of 0.45,
> so I wonder if there is any way the correction is applied twice.
>
> As far as I understand it, jpeg does not support gamma information
> and contains the gamma corrected RGB values for your display gamma.
> Can you post the unprocessed png output from POV for comparison?

The png would be too large (>1 Mb) to post here.

What I wonder about: How do you see the immediate foreground? Too bright? 
Normal? Because it may just be my fog used that is the cause.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message