> Apparently this is already the case in court in the USA. It's almost 
> impossible to introduce a photograph as evidence without the photographer 
> being there to say "Yep, that's what I saw."

Hi-end digital cameras have security features to prove the image has not 
been tampered with since the camera wrote the file.  I have no idea how it 
works but it would seem something like this might propagate down to cheaper 
cameras if there is a demand for proving the image is original.

Post a reply to this message