Darren New wrote:
> Chambers wrote:
>> Or the fact that they keep adding Justices?  At least, that's the one 
>> I got wrong.
> 
> It's been nine for as long as I can remember. Occasionally you have 
> situations where one or more have left and new ones haven't taken their 
> place, but nine is normal?

I thought it was 7.  Looking it up, though, it's been 9 since 1869.

...Chambers

Post a reply to this message