Thomas de Groot wrote:

> 
> Of course you are right about this in principle. However, if "art" means 
> that every single item of whatever production by whoever throws a dot of 
> paint or pushes a button or shoots an image should be considered just that, 
> art, I disagree. Art is no free meal so to speak, neither was it when it was 
> merely a "skill" performed by a crafter.
> 

The closest I have come to a universal tenent with Art is:

"Meaning lies with the viewer."

Sometimes tough to accept.

Othertimes no help at all.

-Jim

Post a reply to this message