Nimish wrote:
> "Hildur K." <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> In the past the voting, as most people here are aware of, was based on three
>> different scores, Artistic, Technical and Interpretation of the Topic. The
>> score was given on a scale from 1-20.
> 
> I too would like to agree with the aforementioned.  Speaking from the amateur's
> point of view, the individualized scoring helped a great deal more on my first
> submissions than did the (at times nonexistent) comments.  In addition,
> personally I am finding it rather difficult to vote on a pure basis from one to
> ten, and find myself giving a score in the three categories and averaging them.
> 

I recall a long debate about this topic where many people said that they 
seldom gave different scores in the three categories and the range 1-20 
was too large.  I've forgotten where this debate took place and can't 
locate it right now.  As I recall, though, we seemed to agree on a 10 
point range and checks for technical, artistic and conceptual.

In any event, I'm happy to change it if we can get a reasonable consensus.

David Buck

Post a reply to this message