On 26-4-2011 0:17, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:05:31 +0200, andrel wrote:
>
>> On 25-4-2011 23:43, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:33:00 +0200, andrel wrote:
>>
>>>> Only if it is nor was at any time able to interfere in this universe.
>>>> (my feeling is that this is correct English, my brain says 'huh,
>>>> aren't you missing a negation', but where to put it?)
>>>
>>> Maybe try saying it a different way - I think I understand, but I want
>>> to be sure before I comment. :)
>>
>> I am prepared to accept any deity if and only if it has never had any
>> influence on my universe and it will never have, and as long as it's
>> existence can be rigorously and scientifically proven by an experiment.
>
> So a deity that has no past, present, or future influence over the
> universe?  I'm not sure what purpose that would serve.

Me neither.

> But that is how I read what you wrote the first time.

And to be sure I added the second clause that is incompatible with the 
first.


-- 
Apparently you can afford your own dictator for less than 10 cents per 
citizen per day.

Post a reply to this message