somebody wrote:
> I like it. "Chronic apathy", it is then.

Honestly, it sounded to me more like you were "following" something more 
akin to ethical objectivism.  Since you bothered to post at all, and 
admit to being concerned for your own self-interest I don't know if 
"chronic apathy" is quite appropriate.

>> but some might not consider that a "school of thought".
> 
> I cannot say I blame them. Reality is too dull for philosophizing.

I'm tempted to make exactly the opposite claim, but I suppose dullness 
is in the eye of the beholder.

Post a reply to this message