Warp wrote:

>>> Ive wrote:
>>>> ambient 0 in the finish statement, otherwise it would emit light.
>>>   That's what #default { finish { ambient 0 } } is for.
>> This does not work if the texture already has a finish with ambient > 0.
>> But I'm pretty sure you know that.
> 
>   Then wouldn't the correct suggestion be "don't put an 'ambient' term
> in the finish of the texture" rather than "use 'ambient 0'"?


Seems like a rhetorical question to me so here is one for you:

Wouldn't this have implied that I agree with your opinion what the 
"correct suggestion" is?

I just did say that 'radiosity compatible' in relation to textures has 
to do with the ambient term. I did never rule out your suggestion (it 
obviously also contains a finish statement), all I wanted was to make 
Kenneth (the OP) aware of this issue and how he 'solves' it should be up 
to him - I think. Now call me a dumb liberal.

-Ive

Post a reply to this message