clipka <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 8bit, charset: iso-8859-1, 21 lines --]

> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > clipka <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > > > for(int i=0;i++<10;)vec[i]=i*i;
> >
> > > Well, that's (1) not plain C but C++
> >
> >   That has been valid C for 10 years now.

> There are still environments where the original C89 ANSI-C is *the* C standard.

  I don't see how that's relevant in this specific context. It's a bit
like saying "we should support Windows 3.1 because some old computers
might still be using it". May be *technically* true, but in practice
mostly irrelevant in this context.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message