Jim Henderson wrote:
> We are talking about the same thing. :-)

Could be.

> My understanding from that thread was that it is ActiveX.

I wouldn't be surprised. But being ActiveX doesn't preclude it being other 
things as well. Technically, Word is ActiveX as well. :-)

> And I'm sure 
> there's a way to install an extension for FF without invoking FF, that's 
> probably what Microsoft has done.

Yeah. And FF is designed to support that, so I'm at a loss why people thing 
something's done wrong. :-)

> Except that it should be designed properly to begin with. :-)

Hard to do, with conflicting requirements. Very difficult to design one car 
that supports both Indy racing and people who don't know how to drive.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
   unable to read this, even at arm's length."

Post a reply to this message