Darren New wrote:
> If the new theory actually does explain *most* phenomena but maybe not 
> all, I don't think it gets rejected out of hand.

On the other hand....

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19726485.700-quantum-randomness-may-not-be-random.html?page=2

"Even so, most physicists are not yet ready to embrace the new models, 
because one crucial problem remains: Bohmian theory, critics point out, 
doesn't make any predictions that differ from those of ordinary quantum 
mechanics."

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
   unable to read this, even at arm's length."

Post a reply to this message