Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> If a new theory contradicts things the 
> current theory explains, there's no good reason to consider it until it has 
> been adjusted to explain that which it says shouldn't happen.

  Perhaps nitpicking, but don't GR and QM contradict each other in some
aspects, yet both are considered the current status quo, to the best of
our knowledge? In other words, a theory contradicting another establishing
theory is not *always* grounds for dismissal.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message