"Severi Salminen" <sev### [at] NOTTHISsaunalahtifiinvalid> wrote in 
message news:498849bb@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>
>>      But I'm happy with the way I'm doing it. ;)
>
> But the rest of the internet is not. Think about them also :D

     LOL! You're correct of course... ;)


>
>
> Really. Gammas should be checked and calibrated (even visually). You'll
> benefit and the others will too.

    So what you're really saying is adjust my monitor to 2.2 and then add it 
to assumed_gamma 2.2 in my scene and then adjust my scene using correct 
ambients until it looks right. But I kind of do that anyway, apart from my 
assumed_gamma is .75. I thought the idea was to play around in SDL to get 
something good out of it? ;)

    It's confusing, that's for sure. I mean, you must be seeing the same as 
me, right? I'm sure I would have had more comments about 'washed out', or 
'too dark' by now if you weren't.  :)

     ~Steve~

Post a reply to this message