"Nicolas Alvarez" <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message 
news:497b5b23@news.povray.org...
> clipka wrote:
>> It's a "Hall of Fame" after all, right? So I think it shouldn't matter
>> *what* they're famous for: Technical "strength", artistic beauty, or
>> whatever.
>>
>> I'm definitely somewhat biased towards the technical side (because it's
>> just the kind of stuff I love), but with that in mind, I'd actually
>> advocate to put more emphasis on beauty and concept than I usually do
>> myself :)
>
> Well, I'd say the less the author had to rely on *other tools* the more
> appropriate for POV-Ray HOF...

   Yes, but times have moved on now...

    Perhaps the thing to do is split it.

    o- PoV only HOF. (Total CSG and render).

    o- PoV/other/HOF. (Use of other tool and render).

     ~Steve~

Post a reply to this message