clipka wrote:
> It's a "Hall of Fame" after all, right? So I think it shouldn't matter
> *what* they're famous for: Technical "strength", artistic beauty, or
> whatever.
> 
> I'm definitely somewhat biased towards the technical side (because it's
> just the kind of stuff I love), but with that in mind, I'd actually
> advocate to put more emphasis on beauty and concept than I usually do
> myself :)

Well, I'd say the less the author had to rely on *other tools* the more
appropriate for POV-Ray HOF...

Post a reply to this message