|
 |
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlink net> schreef in bericht
news:web.497a253fc722a95af50167bc0@news.povray.org...
> Here's something to contemplate: Should the HOF showcase images that only
> show
> off POV-Ray's impressive 'strengths'? Or should it also include POV images
> that
> have pictorial beauty, regardless of what techniques were used? (Of
> course,
> having both at the same time is the ideal; but they are different
> philosophical
> concepts.) I kind of sense that the general attitude is for including,
> first and
> foremost, the 'strengths' side of things. I don't disagree; but that may
> be
> slighting some of the more intrinsically beautiful or complex images in
> p.b.i,
> those that have great subject matter, composition or what-not, but which
> may
> not have gobs of radiosity, depth-of-field, SSS, etc.
>
> Either type of image would be most welcome, IMO.
>
It would be *technique* at the service of *beauty*, or the *beauty* of
*technique*... Whatever the case, imo both should be considered.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
