|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>> I just tried: 3.6: 1min 27s vs 3.7b29: 5s
>
> That has to be eased down, the production version wasn't nearly that fast.
>
Yeah, for production it was like 240 hours with 3.6 for half of the
scene, and 2-3 days for 3.7 for the whole scene (but in a much lower
resolution)..
>> Both used the same scene and same ini. Radiosity was not used, nor focal
>> blur, nor media. I guess the difference comes from bounding boxes or
>> something like that, as IIRC it is caused mostly by grass.
>
> OK, my guess about radiosity difference weren't the answer. Try
> disabling the grass, so we'll see? :)
>
Without grass it comes down to 3.6: 6s vs 3.7: 5s. Those times are the
ones povray itself told me, so that might cause the difference (IIRC 3.7
counts used time somehow differently to 3.6?)
>> -- Arttu Voutilainen
>
> -Aero
-- Arttu Voutilainen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |