Mike Hough nous illumina en ce 2008-12-22 04:07 -->
> Well, I meant too long considering it was a test scene. I started out with 
> POV-Ray for DOS on a 166mhz system, so I appreciate the processing power 
> available these days.
> 
> I did this final render of this scene and wasn't going to post it because I 
> wasn't happy with it. It took 6d 9h 27m to render at 1920x1200.
> 
> -Mike
> 
> "Chambers" <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote in message 
> news:BCF7900EDDC2420A8E99F8E588279E1B@HomePC...
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Mike Hough [mailto:nos### [at] nospamcom]
>>> Took 10 hours 30 minutes to render this which is way too long.
>> Kids!
>>
>> I remember when you could render a few simple spheres, and use the
>> pixels appearing on screen as a rather accurate stopwatch!
>>
>> And a render isn't slow unless it won't finish until after your next
>> birthday :)
>>
>> (Hmm... I think I'll use that as my new sig!)
>>
>> ...Ben Chambers
>> www.pacificwebguy.com
>>
>> A render isn't slow unless it won't finish until after your next
>> birthday.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
Still a problem: the two arches are NOT coventrical!
Apart from that, nice.

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Database administrators do it with their relations

Post a reply to this message