Thomas de Groot wrote:
> In fact, just a little item missing in the foreground, which the figure 
> seems to be looking at. And maybe a bit more detail in the surface of the 
> ground.

Yeah, that ground needs more work. Maybe I can get away with adding a 
few pebbles and an object of interest. (my gf suggested a flower) I 
might not have to re-render the whole thing, as I used compositing 
techniques to speed up the focal blur+radiosity rendering.

> Your height_field is superb. Can tell? maybe, but those typical height_field 
> thingies are used here very effectively to texture the outcrop.

It might help that I used the fastProx2 macro to darken the pits and 
cracks...

> And I agree with Bill. Superb indeed.

Thanks!

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention in my original post that I had to use HDR 
images instead of PNGs for the compositing. There was no other way!

Sam

Post a reply to this message