Kenneth wrote:

> The 'old' POV documentation, with its near-insistance
> on using an assumed_gamma of 1.0, is misleading in that regard.

There is nothing misleading and this "near-insistance" had and has
its good reasons. You should (re)read the list of changes for
POV 3.7 about gamma correction and assumed_gamma. An example why it
is a good idea to use assumed_gamma 1.0 with 3.6 is posted in p.b.i
(and this antialiasing issue has nothing to do with the fact that
the images are in PNG format, it just compresses this kind of images
very well)

-Ive

Post a reply to this message